Socialist Realism
The civil strife and chaos that had torn
Russia limb from limb in the early 20th
Century, although brutally
devastating, did not hail the end of the stability
and power that had
characterized the massive country for so much of history. The
continuing
strength of what was now the Soviet Union lay in the newly formed
support
structure provided by Socialist Realism, a force that directed the
awareness
of, and the arts produced by, the Soviet people. The ideals of
Socialist
Realism deified Lenin and Marx, attributed the Bolshevik ranks with
heroism
undaunted by overwhelming opposition, and directed the proletariat
towards a
better future through reconstruction and industrialization of the
state.
Socialist Realism was essentially a Party tool that, combined with
the
Bolshevik ideals of collectivization and unity, would transform the
people into
a formidable, indestructible mass force. Socialist Realism's
central code of
conduct was, in Stalin's words, to "above all portray
life
truthfully." Any form of art that depicted Bolshevik life was to do so
in a
realistic and accurate manner, "on its way to socialism"; "that
will
be socialist art, that will be Socialist Realism." (Lincoln 333) This
was the
paradigm that all Soviet art was to be modeled after; implemented
in
1934, the formula of Socialist Realism would heavily influence
artistic life in
the Soviet Union until the 1960s. The rise of Socialist
Realism was rapid and
dramatic. It dampened Europe's excitement over Russia's
post-schism, secular art
by redirecting art inward towards the Soviet people
and forcing form and
function upon it rather than abiding by the ideal of
"art for art's
sake." Once again, the ancient religious ideals of Orthodox
Russia were
shunned, and the Party replaced God at the forefront of Soviet
life. The Party
mimicked Socialist Realism as a model for the people, who
were expected to take
the example of their heroic yet humble forefathers and
arise from the masses to
submit themselves to the principles of Lenin, then
confidently lead their
comrades forward to a bright Bolshevik future where
both nature and human
opposition would bow to the power of the Soviets.
Although the Soviet Union was
markedly secular, it adopted Orthodox Russia's
replacement of the individual
with the collective. Many artists collaborated
on gigantic pieces that depicted
the immense size and grandeur of their
unified country. Overwhelming all other
artistic principles, Socialist
Realism became synonymous with the state. It
modified the past and the future
by making both conform to reality and to
Lenin's timeless ideals. Most
importantly, it portrayed the Soviet Union's
future as being filled with an
unequaled prosperity that would forever shame
capitalism and its proponents.
However, much of the "reality" that
Socialist Realism depicted existed
solely in the minds of the Soviet people.
Socialist Realism portrayed
life only as the Bolsheviks wanted it seen, and in
many ways created an
idealistic world of fantasy that "overlooked massive
failures" (Lincoln 335)
such as the death and suffering that continued to
prosper in labor camps
throughout the country. Socialist Realism was Stalin's
aesthetic cover-up of
the horrid, truly real Soviet reality, and if an artist
intentionally or
accidentally ventured too far "behind the scenes" in
his work, official
confession and apology to the state did not always prevent
him from being
sent to one of many labor camps. Socialist Realism was largely
effective in
indoctrinating simple-minded men and women with Bolshevik ideals.
Nowhere
else was this practice more effective than in Soviet literature, which
was
directed towards the unsophisticated, newly literate masses rather than
the
intellectual elite. Much of this literature focused on the Russian Civil
War and
the immortalized heroes that were crucial to socialism's victory. It
was meant
to instill the proletariat with a nationalistic pride that would
direct its
minds and hearts towards the interests of the state. Because of
their
overwhelming prominence, the influences of Socialist Realism were
nearly
impossible to escape. One of the most paradigmatic, and also one of
the first
Soviet heroes was Vasilii Chapaev, a Red soldier killed in the
Civil War and
elevated to the status of legend through the efforts of
Socialist Realism. The
author Dmitrii Furmanov wrote a novel depicting
Chapaev's exploits, which was
made into a screenplay in 1934 and became one
of the most effective products of
Socialist Realism. The book, entitled
Chapaev, glorified the efforts and
persistence of Chapaev's comrades even in
the face of overpowering opposition
and thereby turned the Bolshevik cause
into a heroic mission. The message of the
novel was preserved even through
the hero's death, which occurred during a
moment of personal weakness and
diversion from socialism's inexorable path.
Through the novel, Bolshevik
values become a superhuman force that imbues its
everyday, mortal protectors
with awesome power. Isak Babel, a Russian Jew,
followed suit with his novel
Red Cavalry, which also portrayed life during the
Russian Civil War.
Babel's writing embodied the central principle of Socialist
Realism; he
excised every word that was superfluous to the story's message and
made each
sentence as clear and straightforward as possible. He wrote about
the
Cossacks with whom he had ridden and fought during the war, and in
his text he
addressed issues such as why the strong brought suffering upon
the weak and if
submission was morally acceptable. He also depicted
intriguing contrasts
contained in the socialist mission, such as healthy,
revolutionary spirit and
violent brutality, and often scribbled Hebrew notes
in the margins of communist
flyers. A similar history of the Civil War was
depicted in And Quiet Flows the
Don, written by a 22 year-old Cossack by
the name of Mikhail Sholokhov, whose
identity remained a mystery during the
novel's compilation. An even greater
mystery, however, was how such a
detailed account of the Civil War could have
been written by a man too young
to fight in it. Although the book has become the
greatest novel ever written
about the revolution, accusations of plagiarism
still plague its origins.
Much of the book is taken from first-hand accounts of
the war and from
newspaper articles. It tells the story of the war from the
Whites' point
of view and shows everything they have known - the powers of the
Tsar,
Orthodoxy and Cossack life - overwhelmed by collectivization and
unity.
Although the novel was written with the opposition's perspective
in mind, the
Soviet people could relate to the confusion and destruction
depicted in its
pages; after all, their entire country had been turned
upside-down and it was
now their responsibility to rebuild it. Socialist
Realist film, like literature,
reflected Bolshevik values and the principles
embodied by Stalin's vision for
the future. Every feature was required to
glorify the ideals of the revolution
and depict the power of the collective.
This power was exemplified in the
people's breaching of imposing obstacles,
such as natural disasters and civil
opposition to the socialist path.
However, this portrayal of Soviet life came at
the cost of great censorship
and suppression of varied artistic talents. If a
film did not portray the
Bolshevik cause in a "truthful" light, it
would never make its way to a
public audience. One of the first Socialist
Realist films was Chapaev,
based on the aforementioned novel by Furmanov. It
remains the most popular
Socialist Realist film ever made. As in the Furmanov's
novel, Vasilii Chapaev
is portrayed as a socialist hero whose successful
exploits glorify the ideals
of the Party. Chapaev was exactly the cinematic
model that Stalin was hoping
for, and he praised it as the formula that all
subsequent films should
follow. The filmmaker Eisenstein didn't reach instant
success as the creator
of Chapaev did, for Eisenstein was reluctant to replace
his previous
cinematic style with that of the burgeoning socialist era. His
films, which
focused primarily on life in Russia before the revolution and thus
held
little relevance to the Bolshevik cause, were often rejected by the
censors.
Success eventually found him with his release of Aleksandr Nevskii,
based on
the medieval Russian hero of the same name who countered the
Teutonic
invasion of the 13th Century. Unlike his previous efforts, this film
was
relevant to the times because it portrayed the constantly urgent threat
of
foreign invasion of which Stalin and the Party often warned. In
Eisenstein's
film, Nevskii is depicted as a people's hero who rallies his
comrades to defend
their motherland. Following a common thematic practice of
Socialist Realism,
Eisenstein pitted Nevskii and his army of common men
and women against the
immense, technologically superior Teutonic forces. The
Russians' belief in God
and their country imbues them with the power to
defeat the invaders.
Eisenstein's film was applauded by the Party and the
Soviet people for showing
the timeless, steadfast perseverance of the
Russians against all odds. Like
Chapaev, Aleksandr Nevskii became a model
for Soviet defense, especially in
regard to the contemporary German threat.
The score was composed by Prokofiev,
who created modern music that was
reminiscent of medieval Russia rather than
recycling the exact musical styles
of that time. This contributed to the modern
feel of the film and its
relevance to the Bolshevik cause. Theater during
Socialist Realism
approached the Party and its artistic doctrines from a very
different angle,
showing unmistakable signs of discontentment with and dissent
towards the
entire system. Meyerhold and Maiakovskii were the two men who led
this
theatrical, anti-Socialist Realism movement beginning in 1928, when
their
collaborated efforts produced The Bedbug. Aleksandr Rodchenko designed
the set
and Dmitrii Shostakovich composed the score. The play was an outright
parody of
Stalin's regime and attempted to expose the pettiness and
meaninglessness of
Party codes. Its goal was to lift the Socialist
Realist veil that clouded the
vision of the Soviet people, and it depicted
resentment towards and loss of
faith in the principles to which many people
had given their entire lives.
Meyerhold's and Maiakovskii's following
production, The Bathhouse, was an even
more skeptical satire of Party
policies. It accused the leaders at the forefront
of the Bolshevik cause of
betrayal and negligence towards the true ideals of the
revolution. As
political anger over the plays began to mount, Meyerhold took
The
Bathhouse on a timely and opportune tour of Europe. Meanwhile,
Maiakovskii
committed suicide on April 14, 1930. When Meyerhold returned to
the Soviet
Union, he found himself left with very few supporters when the
Party officially
confronted him regarding his subversive efforts in 1932.
Heedless of the Party's
warnings, Meyerhold continued to write plays of a
rebellious nature until his
statement that Socialist Realism had "nothing to
do with art" (Lincoln
347) exceeded the Party's tolerance. He was
temporarily incarcerated before he
was officially executed for encouraging
"undemocratic" ideas aimed at
undermining the honorable Bolshevik cause.
Meyerhold was essentially the only
independent playwright to bring life to
the stage during Socialist Realism.
After his death, Stalin used the
theater primarily to espouse pro-Party
propaganda and slogans. The visual
arts were likewise greatly affected by
Socialist Realism. The most
characteristic works of the Stalin era were colossal
murals and friezes that
were created by whole contingents of artists. These
giant works portrayed the
life that was supposedly growing better every day
under Stalin's rule. Stalin
himself played a role in many of these works,
portrayed as a teacher and
comrade to the common man. He appeared in idealized
portraits of classroom
scenes or in cityscapes, always among his people.
Following one of its
central principles, Socialist Realism attempted to stifle
all individualism
in art. It focused on the collective and on communal unity,
often depicting
men and women working happily in the fields to produce food for
their rapidly
improving society. However, one artist, Deineka, was able to
preserve his own
individual style while still remaining more or less in the
public eye. He had
fought in the Red Army during the Civil War and had pledged
himself to the
Bolshevik cause. Although he strongly believed in the socialist
path and the
future that it strove to create, he saw fundamental weaknesses
within his
country's leadership. Although art from Russia's past was almost
uniformly
rejected during the Socialist Realist era, Deineka managed to adopt
old
styles and include them in his works. These were seen in "The Defense
of
Petrograd", a piece that portrayed the persistence and determination of
the
Soviet Union's workers to defend their motherland at all costs, and also
in
later works in which he used bright colors and healthy, robust men and
women to
portray society's harmonious relationship with a natural world that
socialism
would one day actualize. In 1935, Deineka decorated the newly built
Moscow Metro
station with colorful ceiling tiles that depicted "a day in the
Land of the
Soviets" (Lincoln 357). They showed men and women working in
nature and
harvesting resources for their country. However, Deineka did not
always conform
to the artistic standards of Socialist Realism. He often
straddled the line that
divided Socialist Realist art with subversive,
"undemocratic" art. For
example, "A Mother", which portrayed a nude Soviet
woman holding her
child, was called "The Madonna of the 20th Century" by some
and a
disgrace to Soviet ideals by others. During World War II, Deineka
shifted his
focus to the battlefront and depicted Soviet men and women again
defending their
homeland, this time from the Germans. He avoided overt
glorification of the
Bolshevik soldiers and instead portrayed them in an
honest and truthful light.
After the war, however, Deineka, along with
much of the Soviet nation, realized
that the "bright future" that socialism
had once promised would never
come. This skeptical outlook towards Socialist
Realism became more common as the
years progressed and noticeable improvement
in the country failed to occur.
Whereas Socialist Realism had begun as a
boon to Soviet artwork and had acted as
an inspiration for many, it had
become a strict regime of censorship and
repression. Those artists who wished
to create their own individual, progressive
works that didn't fit the
Socialist Realist mold had to go into hiding or keep
their art far from the
public eye. They wouldn't be able to emerge until the
1960s, when
Socialist Realism - and the shackles with which it constricted the
art world
- would crumble with the fall of
Stalin.